Why I Value A Charlotte Mason Philosophy

Charlotte Mason predominantly believed in the over-all ‘training’ of a child, educating the whole child, and how to positively parent children. However, the main goal that she desired to accomplish…is to never stray far from spiritual matters. This is what gave her method its life, hope and purpose. Miss Mason taught us that we, as educators of our children, need to follow the Holy Spirit’s leading in all the we do, say, hear and teach. Charlotte Mason once said that “such a recognition of the work of the Holy Spirit as the educator of mankind, in things intellectual as well as things moral and spiritual, gives us new thoughts of God, new hopes of Heaven, a sense of harmony in our efforts and of acceptance of all that we are.”

Charlotte Mason lived in a time during the late 1800s when children were not really considered as ‘whole persons.” Children were more accepted if they were seen, but not heard. They were taught to speak only when spoken to. They had no more rights than a stray dog might have. Poor children were considered an even lower class than that.

I believe that this was very saddening to her. Miss Mason believed that children were special, real people, with their own thoughts and feelings, and whom were worthy of being heard from. She herself desired to hear what those thoughts might be. To teach them that there is indeed a living God who made them. That this living God does not consider them to be worthless mistakes.

This is what motivated Charlotte Mason to be the person she desired and succeeded in being. Her passion for the Lord, life, and children. This is what prompted the philosophy that she strived for during her lifetime. What better reason to base your philosophy of education on, than this?

If you would enjoy learning more about Charlotte Mason’s philosophy of education, and many other things, then grab a cup of tea, find a comfy chair, and enjoy this website to learn more. http://www.charlottemasonmadeeasy.com

The Philosophy of the Novel – ‘The Outsider’ by Albert Camus

The universal theme of absurdism widespread in social life situation has been agreeably symbolized in the novel “The Outsider”. The hypothesis of absurdism has been imitated throughout the novel with the characterization of Meursault. In this context, Albert Camus considers the philosophy of the novel as lonely and sensual by highlighting Meursault’s characteristics in light of absurdism and existentialism. As an innermost theme of the story, Meursault has been focussed as a murderer of an innocent Arab without having any reasonable ground.

On an effective trial, the court sentenced him death penalty. The focal point of the story is to commit crime and its punishment which is justifiable in the eye of law. As an outsider, the author has pointed out some social defects with which social absurdism have been revitalised. The Outsider is a novel written by Albert Camus, an Algerian-born author and truth-seeker. The account is centred on Meursault, who at the outset was victimised to societal shame owing to his incapacity to patent symbols of grief-stricken attitudes for his mother’s death. All the way through “The Outsider” by Albert Camus has been able to manage successfully to put forth dissimilar elements of absurdism through the categorization of Meursault hesitantly. One of the high-quality case in point of his absurdist characteristic is that when he does not show a great deal of interest about his mother’s death when he says, “”Mother died today. Or maybe yesterday, I don’t know” he also doesn’t cry at his mother’s funeral, in our society, a man who doesn’t cry at his mother’s funeral is liable to be condemned.

The author, in this novel, has led his utmost efforts in order to signify the attitude and feelings of those who are enterprising, selfish and exciting. He minutely criticized some defects of social life that are absorbed in prejudice and unmatched criticism of life. Sometimes, the author has found out some truth of very crucial aspects of life. In this actions and reactions of the book, Meursault has critically identified as a man of peculiar beliefs where he has explored his own world of absurdism. Afterwards, the author has tried to detect the truth in a certain place where absurdism never takes place. In view of the above it is evident that in the court of trial, he is asked to say that he regrets his crime, in time-honoured fashion. Meursault, despite of all hazards, he feels comfort in the sense that in order to establish truth, he has done the right thing painstakingly.

In this context, the author highlights the idea of social absurdism,” I did not waste it on God. He tried to change the subject by asking me why I was not calling him father. That irritated me and I told him that he was not my father: he was on the same side as the others.” The author here highlights the social existentialism by creating social humour and mental philology of social absurdism.

The Genesis of Philosophy

The genesis of philosophy can be observed across a wide range of human interests such as religion, creative arts, education and economy. In its very essence, philosophy involves unique belief systems that refine the conditions and thoughts pertaining to life, growth and death. Philosophers are considered to be wise visionaries and thinkers who suffered the tragedy of being labeled ‘eccentric’ or ‘ridiculous’ for their unique pattern of thoughts during their lifespan. Most philosophers were unappreciated during their lifetime.

The genesis of philosophy began with the Roman and Greek philosophers, at around 600 BC. Philosophy evolved when men began to question their purpose on earth. There are several schools of thoughts to philosophy.

The Genesis of Philosophy: Theories

Important philosophical theories that comprise the Genesis of Philosophy include:

* Rationalism: It propounded that human beings are intellectual creatures who have the ability to question and analyze various aspects of life. Parmenides, a Greek Philosopher, is believed to be the first world’s first rationalist. Other popular rationalists include Plato, Descartes and Locke. Rationalism involves establishing a premise and attempting to deduce it. Empiricists also developed during this time, who believed in the opposite school of thought, known as empiricism.

* Skepticism: This philosophy involves continual questioning and testing to obtain knowledge. The theory was articulated by a Greek philosopher called Pyrrho and popularly propounded by Sextus Empiricus.

* Existentialism: This is based on the core idea of non existence of human nature and existence of unique individual characteristics. It was first propounded by Soren Kierkegaard, who held that truth is subjective. He voiced that truth; especially regarding religious faith should be questioned passionately by every individual.

* Structuralism: This philosophy propounds that every field, from religion to science, is a complex system that is made up of a large number of inter-related parts. It was first articulated by Ferdinand de Saussure in the 19th century. The theory was accepted across all major fields. However, it also faced opposition by a group who felt that structures could not transcended. They were collectively called the poststructuralists.

The genesis of philosophy continued after the ‘enlightenment’ era. This period witnessed the rise of political philosophers, who questioned the workings of the governments. Another influential branch of philosophy pertained to socio-economic theories that included two opposing schools of thoughts put forth by Adam Smith and Karl Marx. The former voiced free trade and removal of restrictions whereas the later supported tightening of governmental control. These thoughts helped to establish the base for communism and capitalism.

To learn more about the genesis of philosophy and about the evolution of life and knowledge, visit goti-a.com